Marketers Agree to Settle FTC Charges of Deceptive Advertising, Endorsements
Image: Pixabay

Marketers Agree to Settle FTC Charges of Deceptive Advertising, Endorsements

Marketers falsely advertised supple, a liquid pain relief Supplement

October 6, 2016

The sellers of Supple, a liquid supplement, have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charges that they falsely advertised that their product provided complete relief from chronic and severe joint pain caused by arthritis and fibromyalgia and was scientifically proven to eliminate joint pain.

The FTC's federal court complaint alleges that Wisconsin-based Supple, LLC and its principals, CEO Peter Apatow and his ex-wife Dr. Monita Poudyal, have marketed Supple through infomercials, social media and other Internet marketing, radio ads, brochures, and in-person pitches at community events. According to the complaint, infomercials for Supple featured Poudyal acting as a medical show-style host and Apatow, the creator of Supple, acting as the guest.

Poudyal and Apatow described Supple as a powerful all-natural drink that provides complete and long-lasting relief from joint pain and treats or relieves chronic or severe pain, including pain caused by all forms of arthritis and fibromyalgia. They also claimed that it provides pain relief comparable to drugs or surgery, repairs cartilage, rebuilds joints and entire joint structures, and restores mobility and joint function to consumers with severe mobility restrictions. The FTC charges that these claims are false or not adequately substantiated. In addition, the Commission alleges that the defendants falsely claimed that Supple is clinically proven to eliminate joint pain.

"Companies need solid scientific evidence to back up the health claims they make," said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Consumers should not have to take it on faith that products claiming to provide pain relief will live up to their billing."

The complaint also alleges that defendant Poudyal made unsubstantiated "expert endorsement" claims for the product, and falsely represented herself as an independent, impartial medical expert. The complaint further charges that the defendants failed to adequately disclose that Poudyal was married to Apatow during the time she was promoting the product.

The stipulated court order requires the defendants to have scientific evidence to back up any future claims they make about pain relief, disease treatment, and health benefits, and prohibits them from misrepresenting the results of any scientific study. It also prohibits them from deceptively representing that Supple's endorsers are independent and objective when those endorsers have a close personal or financial stake in the company's product sales.

The settlement includes a $150 million judgment, most of which has been suspended based on the financial condition of Supple and Apatow. If the defendants are found to have misrepresented their financial condition, the total amount will immediately come due.