Student Loan Debt Relief Scheme Charged with Cheating Thousands of Consumers out of Millions of Dollars
the defendants sent personalized mailers to consumers falsely claiming they were eligible for federal programs
A student loan debt relief operation has been charged by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with cheating thousands of consumers from across the country out of more than $28 million.
The FTC says that the defendants falsely promised consumers that their monthly payments would go towards paying off their student loans.
Falsely promised fixed low payments or total loan forgiveness
According to the FTC's complaint, the defendants sent personalized mailers to consumers falsely claiming they were eligible for federal programs that would permanently reduce their monthly debt payments to a fixed low amount or result in total loan forgiveness.
The FTC's complaint notes that, although the Department of Education and state government agencies administer loan forgiveness and discharge programs, none of the programs guarantees a fixed, reduced monthly payment for more than one year, and most people do not meet the programs' strict eligibility requirements.
Charged Illegal Up-Front Fees
The defendants allegedly charged up to $800 in illegal up-front fees, purportedly to enroll consumers in a federal loan assistance program. They also charged a $100-$1,300 advance fee for enrollment in a "financial education" program and an additional monthly $49-$99 membership fee for the life of the loan, which typically is 10-25 years.
This financial education program purportedly provided the consumers access to various resources unrelated to consumers' student loans, such as "Key Ring & Luggage Protection," "Everyday Grocery Savings," "Auto Buying Service and Maintenance Discounts," "Financial Calculators," "medical and wellness discounts," and "Access to Dozens of Informational & Useful Web links."
Consumers Were Tricked
According to the FTC, consumers were tricked into believing that their monthly payments were going toward paying down their student loans.
Although consumers were sending money to the defendants, none of those payments went toward paying off their student loans, and in some instances the consumers' loan balances instead accrued interest. The defendants often refused to provide refunds, or returned substantially less than what people paid.
The defendants in this case are: American Financial Benefits Center, also doing business as AFB and AF Student Services; AmeriTech Financial; Financial Education Benefits Center; and Brandon Demond Frere. All of the defendants are charged with violating the FTC Act and the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule.